Jody wrote: "So my question is - are you working too hard?" Yup. But I've learned a lot!
I think I'll fall back to my original plan of just providing DataObjects for now. When I get this unit tested and working I can decide if I have the energy to pursue providing SimpleFeatures. Thanks for all of the help. Landon On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How is it going? I am a bit worried that you are taking the wrong approach > here... implementing Attribute, Feature, SimpleFeature etc... is not > something any other DataStore writer has had to do? It is not expected of > you; it is not fun; etc... > > - SimpleFeature is intended to be simple to use; not to implement > - Even if you do want to implement SimpleFeature it should be easy; by > extending an existing implementation and customizing the part you need (see > WFSDataStore for an example where we needed to accept the attributes in any > order...) > > So my question is - are you working too hard? > Jody > > Sunburned Surveyor wrote: >> >> [3] I'm trying to implement the SimpleFeature.getAttribute(Name >> argName) method. I would like to know if I should be using the >> Name.getLocalPart method for this purpose. For example: I've got a >> SimpleFeature implementation with an attribute that is identified with >> the name "comment". If I constructed a Name object using the fully >> qualified name "org.geotools.gpx2.names.comment" would the >> getLocalPart method be expected to return "comment". I know this will >> depend on my implementation of the Name interface, but I'm just trying >> to figure out the expected behavior at this point. In the meantime, I >> will leave my SimpleFeature.getAttribute(Name argName) method >> unimplemented. >> >> Thanks for the help. >> >> Landon >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Geotools-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
