On Friday 06 June 2008 11:43:49 pm Saul Farber wrote: > Gabriel, > > I totally understand that the command-queue stuff needs to move > forward. I'm willing to put some time into the gce stuff, but it would > be great if the gce tests were doing everything the are supposed to be > doing (namely, telling us whether or not the build is working!) Then we > could all have a sense of exactly what needs to get done, and when we > actually *are* done. > > The GCE tests do currently load their own data, so maybe I just need to > play with them and document exactly how to run them to see if everyone > can get the same set of output. > > In any case, I think it would be great to move gce to the new command > queue work...can you do the deprecation cycle instead of the full > 'hiding' move for now? Then I'll go through and give it a shot next > week, hopefully?
sure thing, that sounds like a good plan to me. I'll revert all changes in gce regarding command queue on trunnk, and incorporate back ArcSDEPooledConnection as a deprecated class, just like I did in 2.4.x, so you can smoothly go through it. And, please, do not hesitate to ping me to help you. > > thanks much gabriel, Thanks you. Gabriel > --saul > > > !DSPAM:4045,4849af9a247234901796417! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
