Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Jody Garnett a écrit : >> Martin I wrote a quick proposal based on your JSR-275 email; can you >> look it over; make any corrections needed and then call a vote? >> - >> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Switch+from+JSR-108+to+JSR-275+for+Units >> >> >> >> So far the minimal change I could see is to the dependency; and >> changing of a few import statements. We could also break out Java 5 >> madness and catch a few errors but I encourage you to put off that >> work until later. > Thanks a lot. I just added my vote. So if you are happy with the page; call a vote ... > > There is one additional change related to Converter. I will document > it in this page when I will make this change in GeoTools. Since I > don't think that many use Converter directly, it will probably impact > few peoples. Can you document it now? Ie the point of the proposal is to let people know what is going to change *before* they agree to it :-) > The Java 5 generic stuff is actually related to the quantity package, > not the unit one. Because JSR-108 had nothing like a quantity package, > there is no code to generified as of today. However we may want to > leverage this package now that we have it (but it can be a second step). Cool; Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
