Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Where
> - type is the interface (not the implementation class) to instantiate
> (e.g. Citation.class, OnLineResources.class, etc.).
> - attributes is a map of (attribute name, attribute value). Example
> for Citation.class:
>
> attributes.put("title", "there is my title");
> attributes.put("edition", new Date(...));
> // etc.
>
> Would it be acceptable?
Sure - it meets our design goals; is it acceptable as a GeoAPI Factory?
Is there any chance we can document the keys as static final constants
(or in a CodeList? they are formal keys are they not...).
Cheers,
Jody
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
