Jody Garnett wrote: > Thanks for the discussion on this one Johann; we have arrived at (well > you have arrived at) a great balance that will perform well and be > accessible to people writing style editors. > > Back to the proposal so I can vote: > - Jira number? We should be collecting comments on this as we go; I > have created it for you here: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1870 > (there was no 2.6 tag so I needed to make one!) > - add/remove listener for FeatureTypeStyle / Rule (so the user > interface can be made); this should be added to the GeoAPI interfaces > should it not? > - FeatureTypeStyle.toPrepairedStyle() > - Link to the javadocs are fine; you focused on a few new methods; I > will do a quick BEFORE / AFTER section showing how we intend to update > the existing code to implement the new interfaces I have updated the proposal page; I could not complete the section of StyleFactory as I do not see a geoapi interface for that in the javadocs link you provided. Can I assume we will use the existing geotools StyleFactory for now; and then we are happy we will make an interface for GeoAPI?
Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
