Issue is here http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1909
Jody Garnett wrote: >> I am not thrilled at the aspect of re-generating every module. I dont >> even know how to do this with EMF off the top of my head. I would >> rather just include a license file saying that all the files are >> indeed generated and "original" work. >> > Justin you are the module maintainer here; so we need to do what you say > is possible. > > For now (ie today?) we can just update the review.atp file with your > email here - and maybe run the script to "fix" these headers? I think we > were only holding off because we thought it may be easier for you? > >> If this wont cut it I would say lets kick this these emf models out >> into their own project. They don't change much... the fact that they >> are in Geotools is just because they need a place to live. >> > Understood; that is over kill for right now - but should be taken into > our consideration when we do geotools 3 planning. > Jody > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! > Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, > along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness > and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
