hmm - IMHO not having to get a WFS change request is starting small. Just
accepting that we can get the functionality working and work out how to
advertise it later (i.e. there isnt really much point advertising it if its
feature specific) seems to me a much lower bar. Getting the big picture
right usually means the pieces are simpler (cleaner separation of concerns!)
Rob
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Ahh! Herein lies a quandry. WFS doesnt allow per feature functions to be
>> advertised, and most interesting features have implicit or explicit
>> operations that would be nice to advertise per feature as functions.
>> Ideally, those functions are only allowed on those features too.
>>
>>
> Start small start small :-) Listing the functions with parameter names will
> go a long ways :-) Expressions are "untyped" so you don't even have to mess
> around with types for the first cut ...
>
> Jody
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
