Jody Garnett a écrit : > johann.sorel wrote: >>> Johann I have been trying to talk to you about the last remaining >>> design decisions with respect to variable length functions - >>> basically since you started the work. If you notice in my email >>> below I am making a decision to treat the number of parameters as a >>> MINIMUM value - will that work out for you. >>> >> I've already tryed to add this special check in the function >> contructor a month ago when we tryed the categorize function. But the >> Function discovery mecanism raised an error so I haven't push further >> in the expression/filterfactory code. (we exchanged a few mails about >> this). > I recall the emails; I don't think we made a decision? >> If you can fix thoses minimum values check then Yes it is a good thing. > I can fix the minimum value checks (fixing code is easy :-) making a > decision is hard :-( ). Here is my vote for having a minimum number of parameters for each function : +1
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
