Andrea Aime wrote:
>> - aggregate functions for generation of useful summary information to 
>> use when creating styles
> But... don't we have them already?
We do; but they are not passing tests!
>> I have a bunch of possible work I am trying to land:
>> - TAB support (perhaps using a gdal/MITAB bridge)
>> - rendering optimization (and hopefully removal of hacks)
> What optimizations
- optimizations are always an question; that only a profiler can answer
> what hacks?
- the various renderer correcting for datastore mistakes troubles me
- the axis order stuff is really troubling me
>> - an oracle datastore that makes external IDs available as Associations
> Uh, ambitious.
Only if we land it; I would rather see the community schema (ie mapping 
based) approach take point on this topic.
>> - SE 1.1 is a much better fit to uDig's needs than SLD 1.0 (infact it 
>> is exactly the split we need because we define the split in OWS-3)
> May I say the split seems ill defined to me? The example I usually do 
> is, how do you define a highway style in SE 1.1? You cannot unless you
> change the order in which the symbolizers are drawn (each symbolizer 
> on all features vs all symbolizer for each feature)
I was thinking of the split between SE 1.1 (focused on rendering 
control) and SLD 1.1 (focused on mapping of styles to WMS layers). I am 
not sure I understand the exact problem you are talking about ... 
perhaps we can have a seperate email thread on the topic?
>> - H2DataStore - Martin Davis has been thinking up mad plans and this 
>> may be a good hook to involve him in what we do
>> - H2DataStore has a much more organized base for creating new 
>> JDBCDataStores
> To have JDBCDataStore prove itself for good it should try to replace 
> PostgisDataStore 1-1 (that is, have every feature, same or better  
> performance), that would be a compelling story to migrate the other 
> ones as well.
The other form of proof is in how long it takes a new developer to 
create a new datastore - say SQLServer? Based on the code review I have 
done thus far I have no problem recommending H2 as a starting point for 
new work.
>> For GeoTools I would like to see (most of these will not happen; but 
>> some may prove necessary):
>> - documentation (always documentation)
>> - creation of a datastore that is not limited to simple content
>> - the style factory / builder situation sorted out (SE 1.1 work is my 
>> best chance to do this)
>> - the MapContext API sorted out - brought in line with OWS Context is 
>> my best direction on this
>> - The FactorySPI story clean up and possibly replaced.
>>
>> I probably missed a few things; is that enough to start with Andrea?
> Enough to be really concerned about staying on trunk, since some of 
> these changes have a high chance of breaking GeoServer solid and delay 
> the 2.0 release (factory spi, referencing, rendering).
Given that rendering is very important to both projects I would start 
any rendering work by making a copy of StreamingRenderer; both to ease 
your concerns and to have a chance to sort out the method names.

Referencing is the larger concern - referencing has uDig trunk broken 
right now; so my hands are tied on that one. Hopefully I can find a bug 
and fix it ... what could help me is an exact list of the system 
properties geoserver sets in order to effect the forceXY option? I have 
no good solutions on the FactorySPI replacement; as Martin is fond of 
reminding me I need to show a working solution rather than just talk 
about it.

For GeoServer I would also also list Java EE integration as a direction 
for 2.6? There has been some good discussion about making use of long 
transaction support etc...
Jody

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to