Andrea Aime wrote: > Correct, but here Adrian is asking the library contents to be > reviewed, not its published license (at least, that is what > I understand from his mail, apologies if I'm misreading it). I did > not know we scanned all the source of all the open source > libraries we include, did we? We have not done that; but it is something that gets done by large organizations when they consider using our library. This is one of the motivations to minimize our dependencies - it costs less for people to decide to use GeoTools that way. Should we scan the libraries we depend on? Frankly we should ... but right now we choose the cheaper option. Why not list this as one of the consulting services OPP can sell. Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
