I may be wrong, but afaik you should be using -Dall not -Pall. That is, 
"all" is an activation keyword for the different profiles?

Gabriel
Cédric Briançon escribió:
> Justin, when I build with the option -Pall, I can see that not all 
> modules have been built. For example coverageio doesn't own a target 
> directory after the command : mvn install -Pall.
> But some of unsupported modules are compiled, as you can see here :
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Developpement/Geotools/tags/2.5.0/modules$ find 
> unsupported -name "target"
> unsupported/gml/target
> unsupported/ogc/org.w3.xlink/target
> unsupported/ogc/net.opengis.wps/target
> unsupported/ogc/net.opengis.wfs/target
> unsupported/ogc/net.opengis.wcs/target
> unsupported/ogc/net.opengis.wfsv/target
> unsupported/ogc/net.opengis.ows/target
> unsupported/directory/target
> These modules have been compiled, the other one not. So if I build the 
> javadoc with the -Pall, I will just have these modules for the 
> unsupported one, and all others of course.
>
> Is there an other profile I've missed that really builds all unsupported 
> modules ?
> Otherwise the javadoc would be incomplete.
> This phenomenon occurs on a JDK1.6.0_06 with maven 2.0.9 on Linux 
> Ubuntu. I hope this is not a matter of JDK 5/6 because to aggregate the 
> javadoc in the root target/binaries folder, I need to build it in a JDK6.
>
> Cédric.
>
>
> Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
>   
>> Great, that would be much appreciated Cédric. Thanks for the help :).
>>
>> -Justin
>>
>> Cédric Briançon wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi Justin,
>>>
>>> Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
>>>       
>>>> I have the release announcement ready to go and i am ready to hit 
>>>> the "publish" button, but we still have no javadocs. As I understand 
>>>> it there are people who have successfully generated them with java 
>>>> 6? I have not been able to so if someone could do this that would be 
>>>> great.
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>         
>>> Yes, last month I succeeded in generating the javadoc on a JDK6 for 
>>> the tags 2.5-M3. That's why you can see it at 
>>> http://javadoc.geotools.fr/2.5/
>>> If you really needs a javadoc for the 2.5.0 tag, I will try to do a 
>>> checkout of this tag in a few hours, and deploying the javadoc at the 
>>> same place.
>>>
>>> The javadoc should be deployed for tomorrow (I will send a mail when 
>>> it will be done).
>>>       
>>>> If no one pipes up in a day or so I am going to go ahead with the 
>>>> announcement and we will have to upload javadocs when someone gets 
>>>> around to it.
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>         
>>> Regards,
>>> Cédric.
>>>       
>>>> -Justin
>>>>
>>>>   
>>>>         
>>     
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>   


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to