Gabriel Roldan a écrit :
> I may be wrong, but afaik you should be using -Dall not -Pall. That 
> is, "all" is an activation keyword for the different profiles?
>
Yes it works, thanks Gabriel :)
> Gabriel
> Cédric Briançon escribió:
>> Justin, when I build with the option -Pall, I can see that not all 
>> modules have been built. For example coverageio doesn't own a target 
>> directory after the command : mvn install -Pall.
>> But some of unsupported modules are compiled, as you can see here :
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Developpement/Geotools/tags/2.5.0/modules$ find 
>> unsupported -name "target"
>> unsupported/gml/target
>> unsupported/ogc/org.w3.xlink/target
>> unsupported/ogc/net.opengis.wps/target
>> unsupported/ogc/net.opengis.wfs/target
>> unsupported/ogc/net.opengis.wcs/target
>> unsupported/ogc/net.opengis.wfsv/target
>> unsupported/ogc/net.opengis.ows/target
>> unsupported/directory/target
>> These modules have been compiled, the other one not. So if I build 
>> the javadoc with the -Pall, I will just have these modules for the 
>> unsupported one, and all others of course.
>>
>> Is there an other profile I've missed that really builds all 
>> unsupported modules ?
>> Otherwise the javadoc would be incomplete.
>> This phenomenon occurs on a JDK1.6.0_06 with maven 2.0.9 on Linux 
>> Ubuntu. I hope this is not a matter of JDK 5/6 because to aggregate 
>> the javadoc in the root target/binaries folder, I need to build it in 
>> a JDK6.
>>
>> Cédric.
>>
>>
>> Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
>>  
>>> Great, that would be much appreciated Cédric. Thanks for the help :).
>>>
>>> -Justin
>>>
>>> Cédric Briançon wrote:
>>>    
>>>> Hi Justin,
>>>>
>>>> Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
>>>>      
>>>>> I have the release announcement ready to go and i am ready to hit 
>>>>> the "publish" button, but we still have no javadocs. As I 
>>>>> understand it there are people who have successfully generated 
>>>>> them with java 6? I have not been able to so if someone could do 
>>>>> this that would be great.
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Yes, last month I succeeded in generating the javadoc on a JDK6 for 
>>>> the tags 2.5-M3. That's why you can see it at 
>>>> http://javadoc.geotools.fr/2.5/
>>>> If you really needs a javadoc for the 2.5.0 tag, I will try to do a 
>>>> checkout of this tag in a few hours, and deploying the javadoc at 
>>>> the same place.
>>>>
>>>> The javadoc should be deployed for tomorrow (I will send a mail 
>>>> when it will be done).
>>>>      
>>>>> If no one pipes up in a day or so I am going to go ahead with the 
>>>>> announcement and we will have to upload javadocs when someone gets 
>>>>> around to it.
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Cédric.
>>>>      
>>>>> -Justin
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>     
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>
>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's 
>> challenge
>> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win 
>> great prizes
>> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the 
>> world
>> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geotools-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>   
>
>
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to