On Tuesday 21 October 2008 15:07:23 Andrea Aime wrote: > Both syntaxes are fine to me, I'd suggest to choose > the one that keeps the module the simplest and/or > takes less time to implement. I agree, the first syntax (function like) is implemented. My idea is to close this iteration now and extend the language in the next iteration with the alternative syntax. Thus, the people could use bosh syntax in the future: OGC like and "Geotools TXT improvements".
Thanks a lot -- Mauricio Pazos www.axios.es ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
