Thanks for your proposals. Some answers 

1) My fist study was computer science and this is my primary target
2) I skipped the remote sensing exams in favor of DBMS stuff. 

My areas are Java,J2ee,Web,DBMS,Security,Transactions, ... 

I am looking for a theme combining my knowledge in computer science with a 
GIS topic. 

Hope that makes it clearer. 

christian 


Martin Desruisseaux writes: 

> Hello Christian 
> 
> There is of course nice work that could be done, but it depends on which area
> you would prefer to work. Referencing? Coverage? Geometry? 
> 
> In this email I will assume coverage based on your coverage-jdbc plugin, but I
> could develop a bit about Referencing if it can be useful. However in order to
> give more detailed suggestions, it would help if we had some idea about when 
> the
> work would start (because the proposal may depends on ungoing work) and how 
> long
> you can work on it. 
> 
> I would also like to know which kind of scientific theory you are looking for.
> Is is computer science, mathematic or some application field (oceanography,
> meteorology). 
> 
> Below is a proposal applicable to oceanography which would require a good
> background in mathematic. If you choose those kind of proposal, we would be 
> glad
> on our side to try to help you to achieve them. 
> 
>  
> 
> Proposal Number #1
> ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> 
>    In oceanography we have GridCoverage2D of different parameters
>    calculated from Remote Sensing data. Some of the most commons
>    parameters are: 
> 
>       - Sea Surface Temperature (°C)
>       - Chlorophyl-a concentration (mg/m³)
>       - Sea Level Anomaly (cm) 
> 
>    Unfortunatly some of those data may be missing because of weater
>    conditions. Sea Surface Temperature are not available if the sky
>    is cloudy, which is very common in tropical area. Sea Level Anomaly
>    can be available despite cloud cover, except if it is raining hard. 
> 
>    In some cases we really need some estimation of a missing parameter
>    even if it is just a very approximative idea. If a Sea Surface
>    Temperature value is missing because of a cloud cover, we can still
>    get some idea using other parameters because they usually have a
>    strong correlation. For example cold water is often associated with
>    low value of Sea Level Anomaly, and conversely (hot water is often
>    associated with high value of Sea Level Anomaly). 
> 
>    There is what we could do, most simplist approach first, more
>    elaborated approach later: 
> 
>     1) Compute the correlation between two arbitrary parameters
>        (in our example Sea Surface Temperature with Sea Level
>        Anomaly) using some historical data. Then when a Sea
>        Surface Temperature is missing, use the correlation for
>        computing an estimation of "probable" value using the
>        Sea Level Anomaly. 
> 
>     2) Above approach is very naive (real nature is much more
>        complex than the linear relationship assumed above). We
>        can still try the same idea, but replacing the linear
>        relationship by a neuronal network which has learn from
>        many parameters: Sea Level Anomaly, but also geographic
>        area, time of the year, wind speed, etc. 
> 
>     3) Above approach 2 is better than 1 but still not yet quite
>        satisfying. If give just one number (the temperature in our
>        example) while we would like to have some estimation of its
>        uncertanties. A value inferred in such indirect way from other
>        parameters is less "certain" than a direct measurement of Sea
>        Surface Temperature. Bayesian network may be a solution (but
>        I'm probably out of scope of a master thesis here). 
> 
>    I used "Sea Surface Temperature" vs "Sea Level Anomaly" above as
>    a real-world example (with real applications on our side), but
>    such a project would actually be against any arbitrary set of
>    geophysics parameters. 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Proposal Number #2
> ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> 
> Same goals than above, but working on a single image without any attempt to
> leverage the correlation between geophysics parameters: 
> 
>     http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/pubs/paper276.htm 
> 
> 
> Is it the kind of suggestions you were looking for? 
> 
>       Martin
 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to