Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > Not that I know anything about how our labeling works :), but I think > the approach you propose is a good one, ie an option on 2.5.x and the > default on trunk. > > Is there any instances where the new labeler might perform worse than > the old? I ask b/c if so i think the option makes sense b/c some people > might be in for a surprise when updating. If it will perform the same or > better all the time then I am ok with changing the default.
Hum, I haven't done benchmarks, but everything being equal (same parameters) the new labeller should be faster. When you start activating extra functionality it will become slower. My idea was to enable by default a small displacement over lines (say 50 pixels) so that performance stays roughly the same with some extra goodies in the quality department. Anyways, I'll have to run some benchmarks to confirm the above, at the moment it's just some speculation. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
