Roger that. Thank you again for the help. I'll revisit the POM.xml file and will hit the Maven website for information on specific elements.
SS On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Adrian Custer <acus...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 13:14 -0800, Sunburned Surveyor wrote: >> Adrian wrote: "For the parts of the maven doc, leave as much out as >> you can and still >> get your module to compile." >> >> I'm not sure what you mean by "maven doc". Do you mean the site.xml >> file which I asked about? > > No, I was talking about the pom.xml. Leave out anything you don't > strictly need---that seems to be the best policy. > > The site.xml and the .apt file are a bit of a lost cause within geotools > right now since we can't generate the site without much cajoling. I > would encourage you not to spend much time on those for now. Maybe over > the next year or so, as part of our other work, we will cleanup the > build to the point where we can deploy the website nightly---then it > will be worth putting more into the web sites. > >> >> I have downloaded a short tutorial on Maven, but I haven't read it >> over just yet. I need to decide if learning the ins and outs of Maven >> is a commitment that I will need to postpone for the time being. > > right. Postpone it. But if you get stuck, the web site has info. Many of > the xml blocks of the pom are run for a specific maven plugin and the > web site has info on what each parameter should mean. > > --adrian > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
