Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Hi Andrea;
>
> gt-process is still unsupported; indeed I am hoping for feedback from
> the process of intergrating sextante in order to refine this api.
So, do you think it would make sense to have the factory generate
multiple algorithms and have the algorithm describe itself like
in Sextante?
As an alternative, we could split out a descriptive object,
ProcessMetadata, and have the factory and the algorithm return it
on demand:
ProcessFactory {
Process getAlgorithm(String name);
ProcessDescription describeAlgorithm(String name)
}
Process {
...
ProcessDescription describeAlgorithm();
...
}
> I
> would love to know what kind of descriptive information sextante
> provides (since we ended up needing quite a bit for gt-process - in
> order to support wps).
From a cursory look it covers decently the WPS metadata, it has
a name and a title, thought it does not have an extensive
description it seems. Same goes for the parameters, no description
but we have name and title.
Cheers
Andrea
--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
