Hi, I was wondering if everybody is 100% happy with the way the commits ml is setup. In particular, in my opinion the is room from improvement for what concerns the sender mail address and the subject line.
Every time someone commits on the gt2 svn I get a mail sent by svn_geoto...@osgeo.org whose subject may be something like: [Geotools-commits] svn - r32241 - branches/2.5.x/modules/library/main/src/main/java/org/geotools/gml/producer So I don't know, at a first glance, who did the change, and what the change is intended to do. Compare this with the GeoServer commits ml hosted by codehaus. When I commit there everybody gets a message sent by aa...@codehaus.org whose subject is something like: [geoserver-scm] [11065] trunk/src/wfs/src/test/java/org/geoserver/wfs: GEOS-2386 Have FeatureBounding affect the feature collection bounds as well Glancing over the mail list I can see who did what and decide if I want to look into the commit further. With the GeoTools one, if I want to know what's going on, I have to check each mail contents. I know this is pretty minor, but it would be nice if the osgeo ml was setup at least a bit like the codehaus one... if not the "who", having at leat the "what" (commit message) would be a welcome change. If it's difficult or it takes too much time, never mind, I guess this is just a pet peeve of mine anyways. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
