Adrian Custer ha scritto: > Simone, > > thanks for the update. > > On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 20:22 +0100, Simone Giannecchini wrote: >> the only real problem, the >> licensing problem seems to be addressed as of now (see my previous >> email). > > How did you resolve the 'advertising clause' issue? Are we expecting to > change all our docs to include the credit requested by SUN?
Wondering if just making a license page that lists all of the licenses of the packages we depend onto would work. I mean, usually commercial software has such citations inside the about box, or in the last page of the printed guide, and so on... it's not really all over the place, and most often not really in a prominent place either. If instead of just stating "the license is LGPL" we point to a license page that lists the libraries and their licenses, we're already fullfilling the advertising clause enough, don't we? Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
