Andrea Aime wrote: > It should be turned off completely. But judging from you comments > there must be some misunderstanding. > > The two samples I've attached for each map are both drawn with > antialiasing turned on. The one with "thin lines" is what > we are drawing today, without me touching the code. Okay I got it. > The one with the thick lines is instead the code running > without that old optimization. The SLD is exactly the same, > but it should be easy to see that the rendered line is easily > twice as thick. My understanding is that the SLD is now being followed correctly right? > Now what do you think will happen when uDig users discover all > of their maps render differently, and they have no way to > change them back? In GeoServer people can change the SLD > to force a 0.5 pixels line width and they get pretty much > the same result as before. I am going to hide behind the SLD specification for a bit; and apologize for the earlier mistake. however I would like to confirm that non integral widths are allowed. > But in uDig, the UI does not allow you to enter 0.5 as the value for a > line width. See above; I would like to make sure that can be typed in. > This is the kind of change that makes people do work only to get back > what they already have, so expect some pissed > off people. That's why I'm trying to take a soft change path in > GeoServer, so that people that do have fine control > of their line width can, but everyone else can happily keep moving > along without noticing (at least for some time). Understood; thanks for rolling this out Andrea. As part of being on trunk udig will get thrown around a bit. Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
