Correct ESRI WFS implementation - issues are here: - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/UDIG-1287 - http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1501
So how about a GML2 and GML3 implementation based on justin's framework :-) I have had a couple of questions about the GMLDataStore in the last month; we should probably just kill it if nobody is going to work on it - does it even pass test cases right now? On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Gabriel Roldan <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm afrais Tim's issue has nothing to do with ArcSDE, but with the ArcGIS > WFS implementation? > > yet, have a jira link to the issue? > > Cheers, > > G. > > On Thursday 12 February 2009 18:29:17 Jody Garnett wrote: > > > Gabriel we have one outstanding bug with the WFS 1.0 against arcsde; we > > > have no bindings for an errors xsd or something and thus fail to get out > > > of the gate. Has TIM been able to produce a good error message yet? > > > > > > Jody > > > > > > Gabriel Roldan wrote: > > > > On Thursday 12 February 2009 15:32:22 Keane, Tim wrote: > > > > > Gabriel- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been working on producing the requests and responses as you > > > > > > > > > > suggested. However, I am having a no luck getting ArcGIS Server's WFS > > > > > > > > > > to properly apply Filters to GetFeature requests. So for now I am > going > > > > > > > > > > to back burner this. > > > > > > > > I understand. Still, not everything may be lost. Do the ArcGIS WFS > > > > Server claim to be 1.1.0 or 1.0? > > > > > > > > In the event they don't support any filtering at all, we could still > > > > make use of it and apply the filtering at run time, as we do with any > > > > non supported part of a filter. Yes, it will be much slower than > > > > desirable, cause the server wouldn't be applying any filtering and > > > > hence everytime we access it is like a full table scan, but would at > > > > least let fetch the data. > > > > > > > > If that's acceptable we could go that way until figuring out if/what > > > > subset of the filter spec an ArcGIS WFS actually supports? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Gabriel > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Tim > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Gabriel Roldan [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 10:12 AM > > > > > > > > > > To: Keane, Tim > > > > > > > > > > Cc: [email protected]; > > > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: cascading WFS > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Tim, cc'ing the list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > confirmed we lack a binding in our parser for the > > > > > > > > > > ows:extendedCapabilities > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > element. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What would be good in order to make sure we support ArcGIS server is > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to create a JIRA issue for it (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT > ), > > > > > > > > > > assign > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the data-wfs module, me (groldan) as the responsible, and attach > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > following information: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - A GetCapabilities document just like the one you sent me > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - The response of a couple DescribeFeatureType requests > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - The response of a couple GetFeature requests. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for the GetFeature requests I would need the originating requests and > > > > > > > > > > its > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > responses. Ideally, there should be a couple of them with GET and a > > > > > > > > > > couple > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with POST method. And, even more, I need to check the following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - whether the server respects the maxFeatures param > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - whether the server respects the resultType param > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - whether the server works with attribute based filters, geometry > > > > > > > > > > filters, and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mixed attribute/geometry filters > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - whether the server respects the sortBy param > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Despite what WFS servers declare in the capabilities, most of them > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > trouble with at least one of those parameters. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I had that information as separate xml files, I could set them up > as > > > > > > > > > > unit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > test data suite for an ArcGIS strategy in the WFS DataStore the same > > > > > way > > > > > > > > > > I did > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for the others, or if you feel like doing so you can go ahead with > the > > > > > > > > > > code, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > check out how the test data is set up for the others (you'll see > > > > > > > > > > although the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.0 and 1.1 datastores lives in the same module, the 1.0 one is > almost > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > deprecated and waiting for me to have the energy to move it to the > new > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > framework created for the 1.1 one). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gabriel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [quote] > > > > > > > > > > > > >> ...I saw that you were the last > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> one to edit the page on WFS Datastores. I am having problems > > > > > > > > > > creating > > > > > > > > > > > > >> a > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> datasore that connects to an ESRI ArcGIS Server WFS. Geoserver > > > > > > > > > > 1.7 > > > > > > > > > > > > >> chokes on the getCapabilities document attached with the > > > > > > > > > > following: > > > > > > > >> Parsing failed for OperationsMetadata: > > > > > > > > > > java.lang.RuntimeException: > > > > > > > >> Unable to set property: ExtendedCapabilities for eobject: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> {http://www.opengis.net/ows}_OperationsMetadata<http://www.opengis.net/ows%7D_OperationsMetadata> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> Is the WFS Datastore a viable option for federating WFS > requests > > > > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > > > > > >> would I be better off taking a different approach. I was > hoping > > > > > > > > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > >> you might give me some insight before I start digging into the > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> geoserver > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> source to find out that this is not really a mature datstore > > > > > > > > > > option. > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Thanks > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> -Tim > > > > > > > > > > [quote] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gabriel Roldan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OpenGeo - http://www.opengeo.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Gabriel Roldan > > > > > > > > OpenGeo - http://www.opengeo.org > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >----- > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Geotools-devel mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > > -- > > Gabriel Roldan > > OpenGeo - http://www.opengeo.org > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
