I do not mind either way; 2.5.x is safe and it would not take a moment to
update 2.6. Your call Martin (or perhaps the call of the geoapi list).
I see the geoapi list is included in this thread; the breakdown seems
sensible - it gives the WG something specific to review and still gives a
home work that is not passed its documentation requirements.
Jody
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Martin Desruisseaux <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Jody
>
> Jody Garnett a écrit :
>
>> Your example answered my question; as far as I know:
>> - GeoTools 2.5 uses a specific milestone release of GeoAPI-2.2.
>> - GeoTools 2.6 can make the change you describe above
>>
>
> Actually at Andrea's suggestion I increased the version number to 2.3, so
> GeoTools (both branches and trunk) is not affected at all until it decide to
> update their dependency.
>
> Martin
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
