Hey Jody > You would be the main reason for the instability :-) Working on the > style interfaces is the only technical direction for the 2.6.x branch.
Great! I mean, the part that the style interfaces are the only thing changing, not that I will be the reason for any instability.. > the set methods so it should not be too bad. I still want to see a > real user (ie you) try out the geoapi StyleFactory before we decide it > is great. You can see why I am enthusiastic - much of what is needed > here is feedback from a real team. Great too. I've seen that the deprecated methods are also still around, so moving towards it should be smooth enough. > 2.5.x is closed for new development (people are working on additional > formats and stuff but the API is fixed). So in a word - no. OK > Yeah the JSR-275 Units stuff is great; I am happy working with either > the a copy of the SLDParser (copy it and call it SEParser) or Ahm, sorry about the ignorance, but why do you guys want to copy the current SLDParser instead of modifying it directly? I guess there is something here I haven't grasped: do you want to split the current parser and put all the symbolizer-specific methods (such as parseXXXSymbolizer/Mark/Stroke/etc) in a separate SEParser? Well, aside from that, as I said in a previous e-mail, I am still a little confused about how to use the bindings framework. From what you said previously, I thought I should be dealing with org.geotools.xml.Parser and org.geotools.xml.Configuration (and specifically with org.geotools.xml.SLDConfiguration). Is that correct? However, I tried hard but couldn't find the right maven dependency for those classes. It seems to be in org.geotools.xsd.gt-sld, but I couldn't get it neither for 2.5-SNAPSHOT nor for 2.6-SNAPSHOT. Also, there is no mention to the jar in the javadocs (as there usually is). So.. where am I wrong? So: I guess for now I will be moving to 2.6, and making things work with SLDParser. > It will be a pleasure to work with you on this. For us too, thanks for the support! Cheers Milton Jody Garnett wrote: > I am jumping back into the discussion (sorry I have been off sick for a > bit). Andrea has already furnished you with a reply which I have not > read yet; so please view two replies as the start of an interesting > discussion - we are after all interested in working with you. -- Milton Jonathan Grupo GIS e Meio Ambiente Tecgraf/PUC-Rio Tel: +55-21-3527-2502 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
