Hi Landon,

I more or less agree with Jody, I think these things are handled best on 
a case by case basis. Some comments inline.

Sunburned Surveyor wrote:

> - Code in my module that is used to validate latitude/longitude
> values. This could be moved to a utility package so it could be used
> by other client code also working with latitude/longitude values.
> 
> - I could replace the use of doubles in my code to represent
> latititude/longitude values with one of the coordinate classes from
> GeoTools/GeoAPI.
> 
> - I'm accessing data from an XML file. I'd like to rip the use of JDOM
> out of my module and replace it with Sun's StAX (XML Pull Parsing)
> implementation. Is there a way to decide on a common library used for
> XML pull-parsing? This would increase consistency among modules and
> would allow us to share utility code written to make use of the
> library easier.
One thing I have been wanting to do with the xml-xsd module is port the 
streaming part of it to a pull parser, but have yet to do so. So 
agreeing on a common pull parser would be good. There is already a pull 
parser in use in the wfs data store module. I believe it uses stax as well.
> 
> - I'm using classes from Joda to deal with the temporal aspects of GPX
> entities. Could we make this a common library used to represent
> temporal objects in Geotools?
> 
> - I'd like to write an object that represents GPX files and presents
> an API for obtaining information about these files and their contents.
> Is there an existing API in Geotools that I can use to do this?
Are you talking about a single object to represent an entire file? Or an 
entire object model to represent the gpx format/protocol.
> 
> I may have asked some of these questions already. Please be patient
> with me if I am overlooking something obvious. I am making this effort
> so my future work on the GPX2 module fits well with the rest of the
> Geotools ecology.
> 
No problem. I think it is great that you are willing to take the time to 
collaborate and "do things right", instead of just going off and coding 
like mad in isolation :)

-Justin
> Thanks for the continued assistance.
> 
> Landon
> 
> P.S. - I'm trying to stay as far away from the Geotools/GeoAPI feature
> model as I can. This means that most of my modules (and opportunities
> for collaboration) will be with lower level code. :]
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel


-- 
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to