Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Justin Deoliveira wrote: >> So with the (FPT,GU) tuple returned, the binding for >> FeaturePropertyType is up next, and it will be asked for its >> properties being passed in the GU feature. > > With gml:FeaturePropertyType it works. The problem I have is that I have > gsml:GeologicFeaturePropertyType which has no binding. This property > type is not derived from gml:FeaturePropertyType, nor does it have to be > to conform to the GML encoding rules. Interesting... and problematic. Is there a reason why it does not extend from FeaturePropertyType? Or some other type that marks it as a property type.
I don't have a great idea of how to handle this one. My only thought would be to somehow associate with the geotools type that it is indeed a feature property type, via the type metdata or something. I believe Gabriel might have employed a trick like this way back when. > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
