I'd like to see this in the next GeoServer release, so yes, I need this
patch applied to GeoAPI 2.2-SNAPSHOT and GeoTools 2.5.x.  I haven't even
tried applying it to gt trunk, but of course I'll be happy to resolve
any conflicts that pop up.

--
David Winslow
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/

On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 17:46 +1100, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Created a GEOAPI issue here: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEO-158
> 
> Question for you; do you need this patch applied to geoAPI
> 2.2-SNAPSHOT (ie for GeoTools 2.5.x?)
> Jody
> 
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote:
> > That it would; attach to the jira issue when ready.
> >
> > Andrea I noticed that there is a "patch attached" field I can turn on
> > in Jira these days; would that be helpful to identify issues that are
> > so important a developer has made a patch for them?
> >
> > Jody
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:14 PM, David Winslow <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> >> matchCase support would definitely take care of my use case.  I can put
> >> together a patch for GeoTools if that helps.
> >>
> >> --
> >> David Winslow
> >> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org/
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 10:27 +1100, Jody Garnett wrote:
> >>> I was going to say that there is ad difference between what the code
> >>> can do and what the SLD format will allow.
> >>>
> >>> That for exploring the options Andrea; adding the matchCase  option to
> >>> GeoAPI is a good plan - shall we do it.
> >>>
> >>> Jody
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:56 AM, Andrea Aime <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> > David Winslow ha scritto:
> >>> >> Hi all,
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I was trying to do a case-insensitive search against a text field by
> >>> >> making use of the newly added strToLower and strToUpper filter
> >>> >> functions, only to find that GeoTools' parser expects a PropertyName 
> >>> >> and
> >>> >> Literal as the contents of the PropertyIsLike, even though the filter
> >>> >> object itself supports an arbitrary expression for the "property" 
> >>> >> field.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I created a ticket with a patch that makes it act as I would expect:
> >>> >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2396
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I'm happy to expand on the patch if it misses any corner cases, etc. 
> >>> >> but
> >>> >> would like some feedback on whether this is the right direction to take
> >>> >> on this problem.
> >>> >
> >>> > Did not see your mail on gt2-devel but I already provided some feedback
> >>> > in the jira itself
> >>> >
> >>> > Cheers
> >>> > Andrea
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Andrea Aime
> >>> > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> >>> > Expert service straight from the developers.
> >>> >
> >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> > Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
> >>> > powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
> >>> > easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based 
> >>> > development
> >>> > software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
> >>> > Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
> >>> > _______________________________________________
> >>> > Geotools-devel mailing list
> >>> > [email protected]
> >>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
> >>> >
> >>
> >>
> >


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to