[email protected] ha scritto: > Hi Jody, hi Gabriel, > > Thanks for response! > >> I am the original implementor of MemoryDataStore and I am afraid it >> needs a little love and attention. It was used to define the >> datastore api and thus it is really focused on correctness; and not >> speed or efficiency - indeed file based implementations like >> shapefile are faster. > > Sounds good. I created a JIRA issue for MemoryDataStore a week ago > (getBound -Error) include a test case. I would say, i append the > MemoryDataStore patch where the getBounds patch is already included. > Could you generalize the JIRA task to "Bugfixing MemoryDataStore" or > something like that where we could apply all these patches? > > Do you have written any testcases to compare the performance of > memory datastores with file based datastores? I looked into > StreamingRenderer an i guess the envelope of request is not applied > to the layer-filter except the method isMemoryPreloadingEnabled > returns true.
Darn, I need to remember to remove that preloading hack. Don't use it, it was a proof of concept that I made on a branch and that someone ported straigth to mainline while I was not looking. Time ago I looked into making a caching feature source that has a spatial index. Personally I have no use for it, but if someone is interested in maintaining it, it's here: http://www.nabble.com/Render-with-gt2.3.1-td10129502.html#a10160606 Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
