Hi Andrea: The plan is viable; with one small update ...
I would like to release geoapi 2.2.0 for this release; I can do so now. I was waiting to hear back if the ignore case option for the like filter was completed. Jody > I'm trying to find a good solution out of this confusion, but > I'm left guessing. My guess is that we should: > - have gt2 2.5.x depend on osgeo repo > - same goes for 1.7.x (assumin osgeo repo has been fixed, it seems it is) > - have both depend on a geoapi snapshot for the time being? would sure be > nice to have an M3 instead of depending on a snapshot? > > Can anyone confirm this is a viable plan? > > Cheers > Andrea > > PS: it would all be easier if GeoTools owned its API, but > that's a discussion for another day > > -- > Andrea Aime > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Expert service straight from the developers. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and > around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save > $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. > 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. > Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
