> Afaik it was. I asked maintainers that stepped up to update > the pom files, someone already did. > I did not see any reason for a holdup since no module was > claimed by developers in conflict with each other.
Indeed - yeah community spirit :-) >> I feel that after this clean up is done it will be the correct time to >> issue a news item or other formal response to geotoolkit. > > Indeed, the cleanup was the preliminary step in my mind. > >> Would anyone else be up for a "work party" in either going through >> Andrea's plan; or in drafting a news item. Both activities require a >> bit of a careful hand :-) > > What kind of work do you think is missing? I'm waiting on some > feedback on the modules to be removed, if nothing comes up > I'll go and delete them unless I receive a -1 on any module > in the list. In my case I will be merging a couple modules and making some judgement calls on code examples - so I have some careful work ahead. Drafting a news announcement will also be careful work - balancing disappoint against our excitement about the road ahead. Cheers, Jody Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
