Right, I'm willing to maintain it, and think that the first step towards a properly maintained module is to accept reality and move it to unsupported until it can safely be told it earned it's starts (as per the module matrix page)
Gabriel Andrea Aime wrote: > Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: >> Andrea Aime wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> final mail for the modules that need to be moved. >>> >>> The unsupported/ogc modules family is going to >>> be moved to extensions. Mind, the poms are missing >>> a maintainer declaration. >> I will add maintainer declarations for myself. >>> >>> The wfs datastore module is going to be moved >>> to unsupported >> I thought Gabriel was maintaining this? > > He is, but he also asked to move it in unsupported > up until the module is cleaned up. That's his prerogative, > if the does not feel the module is up to snuff and > he cannot fix it in the short term, he's > right into moving it into unsupported land. > > Obviously a helping hand would be appreciated. > > Cheers > Andrea > -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
