Gabriel Roldan wrote: > Hi all, > > as per the modules cleanup thread, I'm willing to take responsibility of > the gt-wfs module, if nobody objects. > > sigh, gonna go to the point since the message ended up being quite large: > > - ok for me to step up as wfs maintainer? This was meant to be > - - ok for moving it to unsupported so I can bring it back to supported with merits? Right now the module claims to have 5 stars (<http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Plugin>), but reality is: - IP check: pass - Releasable: pass, but the list of reported bugs do never goes down. - QA: used in anger? yes, code coverage? who knows, 1.1 should be quite good. Easy to maintain? nah. (half pass?) - Optimized: 1.0 don't know. 1.1 yes, but nobody says it's perfect. - Supported: not really.
so how many stars are those? 2.. 2 1/2.. I can concede 3. > - what's the plan for libray/xml? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, & iPhoneDevCamp asthey present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship. http://www.creativitycat.com _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
