Andrea Aime wrote: > following previous discussions on the mailing list > I've put togheter the following proposal: > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Partial+3D+data+support > > Feedbacks and votes welcomed. Please review at your earlies > convenience.
+1. This looks like a definite improvement. I know it is outside this proposal, but do you see a future for Geotools in true-3D-geometry-land? Would this require extension of JTS, or a new geometry library with complete 3D support? Consulting with a knowledgeable stakeholder yielded these examples of interesting 3D geospatial data: - 3-D line-string (wells and boreholes, atmospheric and ocean soundings) - TIN (geological horizons) - Tri-surface (other geology surfaces) - Solid whose shell is a tri-surface (ore-body, grade-control-surface) What could we support? -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining Australian Resources Research Centre 26 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
