I like this second option; however you are the module maintainer here so we do trust your judgement.
I like the idea of H2 just to cut down on dependencies :-) I belive Andrea Anotonello (as a PSC for the uDig community) also expressed support for this direction. So let me know and I will give this a try on udig trunk? Jody On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:20 AM, Andrea Aime<aa...@opengeo.org> wrote: > Andrea Aime ha scritto: >> So, I'd propose to commit epsg-h2, graduate it >> to supported land, move epsg-hsql to unsupported, >> and check everything works fine for everybody. > > Or else, without getting too much ahead of myself, > I commit it as unsupported, GeoServer, uDig and > whoever else wants give it a spin, and then > we decide what to do ;-) > > Cheers > Andrea > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial > Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited > royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing > server and web deployment. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing server and web deployment. http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel