Better yet can we just accept the transitive dependency from GeoAPI?
On the GeoAPI list we have been looking at the newer version of
JSR-275 - but I have not paid close attention to it yet.

Jody

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Gabriel Roldan<grol...@opengeo.org> wrote:
> sure, thanks.
>
> Gabriel
> Gabriel Roldan wrote:
>> mvn dependency:tree gave me the answer:
>> [INFO] |  \- org.geotools:gt-metadata:jar:2.6-SNAPSHOT:compile
>> [INFO] |     +- java3d:vecmath:jar:1.3.1:compile
>> [INFO] |     +- org.opengis:geoapi:jar:2.3-SNAPSHOT:compile (version
>> managed from 2.3-M1)
>> [INFO] |     |  \- net.java.dev.jsr-275:jsr-275:jar:1.0-beta-2:compile
>> [INFO] |     +- org.opengis:geoapi-pending:jar:2.3-SNAPSHOT:compile
>> (version managed from 2.3-M1)
>> [INFO] |     \- javax.measure:jsr-275:jar:0.9.1:compile
>>
>> Shall I update gt-metadata to the same version geoapi requires and
>> commit? (commenting out the dependency on gt-metadata and relying on the
>> transitive one from geoapi seems to work)
>>
>> Gabriel
>> Gabriel Roldan wrote:
>>> I found GeoServer trunk does not work on Tomcat but does on Jetty.
>>> Reason being there are two jsr-275 jars on geoserver/WEB-INF/lib:
>>> jsr-275-0.9.1.jar and jsr-275-1.0-beta-2.jar.
>>>
>>> So it will work or not depending on which one is first picked up by the
>>> classloader.
>>>
>>> Any clue on how to solve it?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Gabriel
>>>
>>> Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
>>>> Simone Giannecchini wrote:
>>>>> Please, reopne the ticket, I will see what I can do to make use of one
>>>>> of the standard jars on the jsr-275 website.
>>>> I have reopened it.
>>>>
>>>> We should be able to set the new artifact version in dependency
>>>> management. The problem is that 1.0.0 pom appears to redirect to 0.9.1,
>>>> which contains less than 1.0-beta-2. If you can get a single jar used
>>>> across GeoTools, and a maven build passes, eclipse will most likely be
>>>> happy.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Gabriel Roldan
> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
> Expert service straight from the developers.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to