Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> Thanks Gabriel, that is a definite improvement. GEOT-2608 committed as >> r33538. > > Still not enough to get FeatureChainingTest to run with 256M heap, as on > Hudson. > nope, but because of a memory leak. If you run FeatureChainingTest only you can do that with 128m: mvn test -Dtest=org.geotools.data.complex.FeatureChainingTest -Dtest.maxHeapSize=128m -o
So the two improvements needed keep being: - lazy parsing of emf elements/types into gt descriptors/types - fix mem leak (DataAccessRegistry is my suspect) I am looking into the former now. No promises though, it's getting late, but I may hopefully come up with at least a sensible plan. As for the seconds, I would also like to provide a patch. But may be over the weekend as this is spare time. Cheers, Gabriel -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
