I get the impression from Justin's comments on the bug reports that we will need to modify the code generation program and regenerate the bindings; and your idea of including the settings (say in a header comment) is a good one.
So I am still a bit unclear on what you would like to see happen? For now I will make a milestone release and hope you can sort things out later in the week? Jody On 23/08/2009, at 7:11 PM, Rob Atkinson wrote: > yes - at some length, and I think I tried every remotely possible > looking parameter and still couldnt get it to generate a > GMLSchema.java file. > > It would be sensible for autogenerated files to include configuration > settings used to generate them. > > If you are happy to expediently cope with a rebuilt piece of > autogenerated code post-release then maybe its not such a blocker - > but we need it in the build ASAP. > > Rob > > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 10:58 AM, Jody > Garnett<[email protected]> wrote: >> Rob have you gone through the tutorial on generating code? It did >> work for >> me last time I used it ... >> - http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTDOC/0+Purchase+Order+Parsing+Tutorial >> >> I am not sure if anyone is in a position to help on this one? It >> looks like >> you have reached the limit of the GMLSchema and justin has asked >> you to look >> into the code generator (or write a new code generator) in order to >> proceed. >> >> So while this may be a critical issue for your team it does not >> have anyone >> working on it. I actually have a few subjects in this category >> myself - but >> I am not trusting them to get done before 2.6.0. >> >> Is there any work about to (wrap up) that needs to interact with >> the release >> train? >> >> Jody >> >> On 21/08/2009, at 11:35 PM, Rob Atkinson wrote: >> >>> GT-2505 is marked as a critical issue, preventing release. I think >>> this is appropriate. Its not an issue the community can fix as its >>> autogenerated code and we have a technical debt in the fact that the >>> generation process is not documented enough to allow the community >>> to >>> rebuid, test and submit a patch. We probably need to create special >>> module maintenance procedures where such circumstances exist, since >>> its not really feasible to use community-supplied contributions. >>> >>> Rob >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Jody >>> Garnett<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> This is mostly a heads up to a couple of active developers near and >>>> dear to 2.6.x work :-) >>>> - Andrea has a couple of patches to get in... >>>> - Michael was about adding a dependency to process.. >>>> - Jody is finish website example code... >>>> >>>> The plan >>>> - make a milestone release today (or on the weekend); followed by >>>> - a release candidate next Wednesday >>>> >>>> Jody >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports >>>> 2008 >>>> 30-Day >>>> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - >>>> and >>>> focus on >>>> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >>>> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Geotools-devel mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >>>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
