+1 from me. Not only are these build platforms that we should support, running unit tests on them is also a proxy for *deployment* on these platforms. I think it is essential have Hudson coverage.
Kind regards, Ben. Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > thanks to the dedicated work of many people we now have a successful > GeoTools trunk build on Windows, in a path containing spaces: > > http://hudson.opengeo.org/win32/ > > Now, to avoid the work to go in vain we should make sure the build > keeps on working. To do so, I would like Hudson to notify people > when the build fails. > > The "GeoTools-trunk" build is a JDK 5 build on windows + path with > spaces. It runs once a day since the build "server" is actually a small > VM. Ok to let it send mails? > > The "GeoTools-trunk-jdk6" is like the one above, but builds on JDK 6. > I personally believe it's important to have JDK 6 builds working as > well, because: > - it will make the transition to jdk6 easier > - outsiders trying to build gt2 will most likely try to build it with > Java 6 nowadays > Ok to let this build send mails on failure as well? > > Cheers > Andrea > -- Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]> Software Engineer, CSIRO Exploration and Mining Australian Resources Research Centre 26 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
