Alessio Fabiani ha scritto: > Hello Jody, > > thanks for the reply ... I agree to move the discussion on GeoApi ml and > try to find an agreement as soon as possible in order to fill this gap. > > It is also worth to point out that it is quite urgent, imho, to move > forward this matter and to have soon an improvement of the referencing > Temporal CRS, especially now that we are working hard on ND stuff ... > notice that the WCS bindings are already based on the gt temporal module > and many of the ND-plugins need to know how to handle temporal objects. > > Since, as already pointed out in some previous emails, the temporal > module is stable and well tested and documented, my proposal would be to > finish the porting on trunk of the latter and start threads on GeoAPI as > soon as possible in order to understand how to better integrate the > referencing Temporal CRS with the temporal objects. > > About this last sentence, I propose also to merge directly the temporal > stuff into the referencing module instead of having a separate module on > library. > > What do you think about that?
I'd prefer to have them separate, I'm maintaining the referencing module but I could not cover the temporal part. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
