I take it all the additions to the symbolizer api are additive? I would think (I could be wrong) that udig is a special case in that it has actually implemented the symbolizer interfaces directly. Imo the risk of breaking existing code is worth the reward on this one.
2c. Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > I've committed the geometry transformations work on > trunk, it can be tested by anyone checking out the > code there. > > As for backporting to 2.6.x to make it available to > GS 2.0.x and uDig... heh! > The extra functionality is sure very nice, however > the patch changes the Symbolizer API a little (would > break only people that implemented custom GeoTools > Symbolizers thought, unlikely) and more importantly > it's a 128k mammoth (interesting how the patch size > is a power of two... I promise I did not do that > on purpose!). > > Opinions? > > Cheers > Andrea > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
