Andrea, the best would be to focus on SUN and OpenJDK. If we have clean builds here, I will do the IBM part.
Deal ? Andrea Aime writes: > Christian Müller wrote: >> I think we need a strategy for this. At the moment my mail account is >> bombed with notifications from the two hudsons. >> As I contacted Ben, he opened GEOS-3689 with priority "Blocker". I could >> do the same for errors which occur more then once in the same build. >> Another possibility would be to forward the error notifcation to somebody >> acting as a coordinator. >> As far as I know, I am the only one use IBM jdks. But thanks to openjdk, >> they have many errors in common. Fixing for OpenJdk will fix a lot for >> IBM. A good example for this is GEOT-2546 which is really a nasty bug. >> There are also differences regarding 32 and 64 bit. A good example is the >> CropTest.testCropRotated which fails in the 64 Bit builds. >> How should we attack this issue, I think most of us will have to >> contribute something :-) > > The main issue I see is that you're the only one with a business interest > on this. Unless OpenGeo starts to get customers with > IBM setups I doubt I'll get any work time to look into this, and > the deal is probably the same for anybody else. > > So I can try to put some of my spare time on this, hoping the issues > are not so many and can be solved quickly. > > Cheers > Andrea > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Return on Information: Google Enterprise Search pays you back Get the facts. http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
