Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > Sounds like a good idea to me. Although did we officially deprecate any > of the plugin jdbc modules? Or was that more or less implied when we > started shipping the new ones?
Right, no, we did not. The question is... have we ever deprecated a module? Like, how do we do that, deprecate every class in it? I guess that moving a module in unsupported is similar as they are not part of the release but they can still be built from sources (so it makes things a bit harder than deprecating classes leaving them in place). One thing that came to mind is: are the new classes a drop in replacement for the older ones? I know of one regression, the old classes allowed to grab the connection for a certain GT Transaction, this allowed straight JDBC code to participate in the same transaction as GeoTools. The new one do not. It's a small change, but something we should do to preserve a viable upgrade path. Wondering, are there other significant incompatibilities? (where significant is, lack of any way to do something that was possible with the old code) Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
