Jody Garnett ha scritto: >> As stated before I like the direction this is going, just worried a >> bit about the timing and the fact this would make porting patches >> over from 2.6.x to trunk (or vice versa) harder for a few months >> (until we release 2.7.0) > > > So is that worry enough for a +0? Or could you make a good suggestion > with respect to timing?
I leaning towards +0 because of this but I would like to hear what others have to say about the proposal as well. As for SimpleFeatureIterator, well, the patch is there is get rid of generics, the readers and the writers are something we don't expect people to use anymore (though, mind, we never deprecated them) but FeatureIterator is what anyone using feature collections should be using, so yeah, I think it makes sense to go all the way down with it and introduce a SimpleFeatureIterator Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
