Jody Garnett ha scritto: > On 25/05/2010, at 8:12 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> Jody Garnett ha scritto: >>> Interesting. >>> Could you add some kind of scoping? Something like ${feature.bounds} for >>> the bounds of the current feature? >> How has that anything to do with the topic of this thread? :-) > > You asked about a "dynamic" scope that was a feature by feature basis; > apparently "bounds" was not a good example. > The question is can we do something to the substitution name to make it > obvious when an environmental variable is dynamic or not?
Ah, I see, a naming convention. Something like dynamic.abc that would make abc as a variable that is supposed to change over the rendering/data retrieval process? Yeah, can be a way Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel