Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> On 25/05/2010, at 8:12 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
> 
>> Jody Garnett ha scritto:
>>> Interesting.
>>> Could you add some kind of scoping? Something like ${feature.bounds} for 
>>> the bounds of the current feature?
>> How has that anything to do with the topic of this thread? :-)
> 
> You asked about a "dynamic" scope that was a feature by feature basis; 
> apparently "bounds" was not a good example.
> The question is can we do something to the substitution name to make it 
> obvious when an environmental variable is dynamic or not?

Ah, I see, a naming convention. Something like
dynamic.abc

that would make abc as a variable that is supposed to change over the 
rendering/data retrieval process?
Yeah, can be a way

Cheers
Andrea

-- 
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to