Comments inline; but yes we all agree about the direction. Where we are stuck is on some of the details.
On 26/05/2010, at 9:12 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > doc/ > user/ > devel/ > web/ Agreed. trunk/web would be the current website trunk/devel would be the current developers guide 2.6.x/user would be the current "stable" users guide > 1. Integrate the doc generation into the maven build. Sounds fine; the maven hacking is proving a bit tough these days. I have been unable to build a clean checkout of trunk on one of my machines due to the cycle involved in build javadoc. > 2. Update the assembly process to create -doc artifacts for the user and > developer guides. These artifacts would be mostly for release purposes. Yep. > 3. Add the doc generation to the opengeo hudson build server. This would > give us continuous builds on docs. On each build we could upload the > resulting docs to the osgeo box (or wherever we decide to host them). > > Thoughts and opinions welcome. I can write up a proposal if need be but > want to get some initial feedback first. I think a very short proposal would be good; no more detail then what has been provided in email thus far. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
