I still think that one of the wfs modules makes more sense. Especially if gt-xml is a deprecated module?
On 10-06-02 9:22 AM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > On 6/2/10 3:16 AM, Jody Garnett wrote: >> Reviewing gt-xml; it is very much non core. > agreed > >It is simply collecting the first generation gtxml parser design (for > >some reason I though that the SLDParser and others were here (instead > >they are still in main). > > I would ideally move it to unsupported/xml as staging area until we can > get rid of all the old xsd handling types, and then move it to > extension/xml depending on extension/xsd/xsd-<as needed>. But that would > leave us with a library module (gt-wms) depending on an unsupported > module. So I'd rather prefer moving it to extension/xml and "gradually > cur over" from there? > > Note extension/xsd/xsd-wcs also depends on it, which seems unfortunate > but I guess it's to handle some wcs 1.0 stuff that doesn't use the xsd > framework? > > All in all, good stuff, I certainly hope to see this kind of clean up > happen. > > Cheers, > Gabriel > >> >> So that leaves me running in circles... >> >> Idea: - move gt-xml to extension/xml (allowing wms and wfs to depend >> on it) >> >> Idea: - move gt-xml to extension/xsd/xsd-old (this would keep it >> clean; be truthful; and make it obvious what is going on) >> >> Idea: - Use the module where it is now - Add in the dependencies >> mentioned in the previous email - Gradually cut over... >> >> Jody >> >> >> On 02/06/2010, at 12:00 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: >> >>> After friendly IRC chat with Gabriel... >>> >>> Looks like asking gt-xml to take on the task is the best way >>> forward; it offers a central spot for GML handling that other >>> modules can use. >>> >>> My strategy will be to review the wps parser configuration (where >>> it is configured with with both GML2 and GML3 allowing the XML >>> namespace definitions to indicate what is going on). I am going to >>> add in the WFS configuration as well so I can parse OpenLayers >>> feature collections which extend WFS FeatureCollection. >>> >>> So Gabriel is that the right idea? Did I miss anything. >>> >>> Jody >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel >> mailing list [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > > -- Justin Deoliveira OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Enterprise support for open source geospatial. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
