Dear Jody, we did not look directly at the annotation but at the metadata that is provided by a processfactory (which might be based on the annotations).
Problems were that some input datatype were just of type "Object" so it is hard from that to create a process description automatically. Hope that helps. Regards, Bastian Am 22.09.2010 16:14, schrieb Jody Garnett: > Morning Andrea: > > I would like to gather up the annotations used for the process module; so I > may have some questions for you over the next couple of days. > > I understand the latest ones you were working on are here: > - > http://svn.codehaus.org/geoserver/trunk/src/community/wps/src/main/java/org/geoserver/wps/jts/ > > I think I can take these back easily (they still have geotools headers). > > Bastian you had a look at the annotations, did you want to join me in back > porting these? It is a good chance to get > in any feedback you had. > > Moovida I don't think these will effect your project; as they are strictly > another way to declare a process (and build > up the same datastructure). > > Jody > PS. I think we can leave sextante integration as an unsupported module for > another day -- Bastian Schäffer 52° North Initiative for Geospatial Open Source Software GmbH Martin-Luther-King-Weg 24 Fon: +49-(0)-251–396371-41 Fax: +49-(0)-251–396371-11 email: [email protected] 52North-site: http://www.52North.org General Managers: Dr. Albert Remke, Dr. Andreas Wytzisk Local Court Muenster HRB 10849 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
