On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Andrea Aime
<andrea.a...@geo-solutions.it> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to use app-schema with a target schema that, unfortunately,
> uses a DirectPosition as
> the feature "geometry". I don't have any control over the schema so I
> have to try and make it work
> anyways.
>
> What I get overall is that my points are turned into their WKT
> representation when the
> GML encoding happens. Which is not what I want.
>
> Looking a bit more deeply I see that the attribute is correctly bound
> to DirectPosition:
> ComplexTypeImpl http://www.opengis.net/gml:DirectPositionType extends
> doubleList(axisLabels:NCNameList,srsDimension:positiveInteger,srsName:anyURI,uomLabels:NCNameList)
> but nowhere in the code there is an attempt to use converters to turn
> the JTS Point into a DirectPosition.
>
> Now, I tracked down the issue to XPath.convertValue:
>
> private Object convertValue(final AttributeDescriptor descriptor,
> final Object value) {
> final AttributeType type = descriptor.getType();
> Class<?> binding = type.getBinding();
>
> if (type instanceof ComplexType && binding == Collection.class) {
> if (!(value instanceof Collection) && isSimpleContentType(type)) {
> ArrayList<Property> list = new ArrayList<Property>();
> if (value == null && !descriptor.isNillable()) {
> return list;
> }
> list.add(buildSimpleContent(type, value));
> return list;
> }
> }
> if (binding == String.class && value instanceof Collection) {
> // if it's a single value in a collection, strip the square
> brackets
> String collectionString = value.toString();
> return collectionString.substring(1, collectionString.length() -
> 1);
> }
> return FF.literal(value).evaluate(value, binding);
> }
>
> type is a complex type, but binding for some reason is exactly
> Collection.class,
> which results in the wrong code path being chosen (the right one, imho, would
> be the usage of the last line, FF.literal(value).evaluate(value, binding),
> which
> could be expressed also as Converters.convert(value, binding)).
>
> Now... does anybody know why the binding ends up being a collection instead
> of org.opengis.geometry.DirectPosition?
> I still haven't quite tracked down where the bindings are built...
Ok, tracked it down.
The GMLSchema class contains the definitions of many gml foundation types,
for point the definition is:
public static final AttributeType POINTTYPE_TYPE = build_POINTTYPE_TYPE();
private static AttributeType build_POINTTYPE_TYPE() {
AttributeType builtType;
builtType = new AttributeTypeImpl(
new NameImpl("http://www.opengis.net/gml","PointType";),
com.vividsolutions.jts.geom.Point.class, false,
false, Collections.<Filter>emptyList(),
ABSTRACTGEOMETRICPRIMITIVETYPE_TYPE, null
);
return builtType;
}
Notice the direct binding to Point.class.
But for DirectPosition it is:
public static final ComplexType DIRECTPOSITIONTYPE_TYPE =
build_DIRECTPOSITIONTYPE_TYPE();
private static ComplexType build_DIRECTPOSITIONTYPE_TYPE() {
ComplexType builtType;
List<PropertyDescriptor> schema = new ArrayList<PropertyDescriptor>();
schema.add(
new AttributeDescriptorImpl(
NCNAMELIST_TYPE, new
NameImpl("http://www.opengis.net/gml","axisLabels";), 0, 1, true, null
)
);
schema.add(
new AttributeDescriptorImpl(
XSSchema.POSITIVEINTEGER_TYPE, new
NameImpl("http://www.opengis.net/gml","srsDimension";), 0, 1, true,
null
)
);
schema.add(
new AttributeDescriptorImpl(
XSSchema.ANYURI_TYPE, new
NameImpl("http://www.opengis.net/gml","srsName";), 0, 1, true, null
)
);
schema.add(
new AttributeDescriptorImpl(
NCNAMELIST_TYPE, new
NameImpl("http://www.opengis.net/gml","uomLabels";), 0, 1, true, null
)
);
builtType = new ComplexTypeImpl(
new
NameImpl("http://www.opengis.net/gml","DirectPositionType";), schema,
false,
false, Collections.<Filter>emptyList(), DOUBLELIST_TYPE, null
);
return builtType;
}
That is, it's built as a complex type, and all complex types bind to
Collection.class (that's inside the
ComplexTypeImpl constructor).
The change I'm tempted to perform is to make the direct position bound
to a opengis DirectPosition
instead. It would contain the ordinates and the crs, but not the other
attributes...
And then make a converter between Point and DirectPosition... the
DirectPositionTypeBinding
is actually already there and should work
Thoughts?
Cheers
Andrea
-----------------------------------------------------
Ing. Andrea Aime
Senior Software Engineer
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054 Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584962313
fax: +39 0584962313
http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
http://twitter.com/geowolf
-----------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized
environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security
easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the
two and get a better understanding.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
