Hi Kenneth,

Thanks for that - the new text helps somewhat, although as a naive
(EMF-wise) reader I'm still unclear on the advantages for critical
applications. In a past life I've worked on wildfire modelling,
including reviewing software used for real-time fire incident
management, so I've been trying to relate your description to that
context. The way I read your text, EMF is favoured because it can
increase system reliability and decrease development iteration time.
What I'm missing is what you can do with that approach that you can't
do otherwise, or perhaps can't do nearly as well. In particular, the
connection with temporal data remains unclear.

If you could point me to any examples or references that speak to this
I'd be very interested, but don't waste any time labouring further
over the proposal because I'm just asking out of curiosity.

Michael


On 16 April 2011 07:25, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy
<kenneth.gulbrand...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
> The feedback is much appreciated. See my response below.
>
> 2011/4/14 Michael Bedward <michael.bedw...@gmail.com>
>>
>> Hi Kenneth,
>>
>> I'm one of the PMC members. Welcome, and thanks for putting up your
>> proposal.
>>
>> I also work with data from experimental settings, and having spatial
>> and temporal components, so I'm interested in your proposal. However,
>> after reading it I don't properly understand what, precisely, a
>> spatially-enabled EMF provides. This could be just because I'm not an
>> EMF user and have only a basic understanding of its design and use,
>> but your proposal would be easier to digest if the last section was
>> moved to the beginning (rather than the proposal leaping directly into
>> implementation details) and described more clearly what your module
>> will provide that is not available currently, ie. what GeoTools users
>> could do with it that they cannot do, or do easily, now.
>
> I agree. My first draft had the background section at the beginning. It is
> now moved to the front again, and totally rewritten. A use-case section is
> also added (still a work-in-progress) so the benefits of spatially enabled
> EMF models  is easier to understand for those who do not know EMF or
> model-driven engineering intimately.
> Check it out: http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/EFeatureDataStore
>
>>
>> Michael
>>
>>
>> On 14 April 2011 10:18, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy
>> <kenneth.gulbrand...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi list!
>> > I have completed my proposal for adding spatial support to EMF models.
>> > The
>> > proposal can be found
>> > here http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/EFeatureDataStore.
>> > I believe the next step is to ask for access to the unsupported folder
>> > in
>> > the SVN repo so code can be shared and reviewed by those who are
>> > interested.
>> > Sincerely,
>> > Kenneth Gulbrandsøy
>> >
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
>> > Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
>> > priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and
>> > improve
>> > application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about
>> > boosting
>> > the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Geotools-devel mailing list
>> > Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>> >
>> >
>
>
> Kenneth

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload 
Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve 
application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about boosting 
the value of server virtualization. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to