> But we can talk about these things on the email list?
Sure. Sorry, I should always use the list rather than private mail.
> 1) talk a little bit
> 2) create a read-only datastore
> 3) go through how to use (can copy the examples directly)
You already made a start at this here:
http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/tutorial/advanced/contentdatastore.html.
Should I keep all that or toss it out and start over or ... ?
> 6) talk about performance and show a couple performance examples
(cache bounds and number of rows for example)
Uh, yeah. I haven't thought about performance at all. If we simply
'copy' some of the tricks from the AbstractDataStore tutorial, that
seems a bit silly. In fact, that reminds me I've been meaning to ask:
Shouldn't we explicitly describe the differences (and pros and cons)
between AbstractDataStore and ContentDataStore? There's a short Note at
the beginning of the CDS tutorial, but it doesn't really describe the
differences in detail and doesn't answer why/when you would want to use
one vs the other.
> 7) Construct JUnit test case
(extending a base JUnit "conformance" test case with if we are
really cool)
Sure. I created several tests as part of writing the CSV support (see
CSVDataStoreTest). I'm not sure what you mean by "base JUnit conformance
test" -- please explain.
Lee
On 5/24/2011 7:25 AM, Jody Garnett wrote:
Nice!
I was going to follow the same format as the abstract datastore; that
is...
1) talk a little bit
2) create a read-only datastore
3) go through how to use (can copy the examples directly)
4) create a read-write datastore
5) go through how to use (can copy the examples directly)
6) talk about performance and show a couple performance examples
(cache bounds and number of rows for example)
go through any extra stuff to make it "real" (this would be where
lat/lon columns would occur)
But we can talk about these things on the email list?
I was thinking of adding something new:
7) Construct JUnit test case
(extending a base JUnit "conformance" test case with if we are
really cool)
What do you think?
--
Jody Garnett
On Tuesday, 24 May 2011 at 11:54 PM, Lee Breisacher wrote:
Hi Jody. Just wanted to be sure you saw this comment on GEOT-3580:
I just committed r37263 of gt-csv. I believe with this commit, there is
now sufficient CSVDataStore working to finish this tutorial:
http://docs.geotools.org/latest/userguide/tutorial/advanced/contentdatastore.html#to-be-continued
There are still some other things we could/should do to the csv support,
e.g. the 'generalizing' of the LAT/LON columns.
Let me know if you'd like me to take a shot at finishing the tutorial.
If so, some advice on what you had in mind would be helpful. Otherwise,
I'm open to working on anything else -- point me at something.
Thanks,
Lee
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
Download your free trial now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
