You have a +1 for the module so no need to wait on our account.
Indeed it is safer for you if commit now, and just not include your module
in the unsupported/pom.xml until you are happy?
Jody
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Kenneth Gulbrandsoy <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> The "unsupported/EFeature" model is now moving along nicely. I've
> successfully implemented and tested EFeatureReader. Some testing still
> remain (EMF Query to Geotools Query not tested), but I have a stable working
> base, which implements all but the EFeatureWriter and EFeatureTransaction
> classes.
>
> I have run a "mvn clean install" on trunk without breaking my build, which
> I believe brings me to the next step: committing it to SVN.
>
> I'll wait the recommended three days before I do the commit.
>
> Cheers,
> Kenneth
> --------------------
> wiki: EFeature<http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/EFeatureDataStore>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
> With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
> you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
> Download your free trial now.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection.
Download your free trial now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
